Mr. Queen states “The attrition challenges presently confronting Clean Development Mechanism validators are not new to the business world, however; nor are they unique throughout time. They are the precisely the same challenges facing large corporate law firms everyday due to the interactions between their brightest younger associates and the wealthy business clientele and institutions they represent.“

Mr. Queen postulates that the types of salary adjustment decisions and scales utilized by large corporate law firms are precisely the mechanism that could rectify their attrition problems and would have a significant impact on the streamlining of the overall validation process.

• Big law firms typically are not understaffed and can grow to match client demand.
• Though in law firms there is widespread attrition among young to mid-level associates, it is manageable from a business point of view because more experienced senior associates and partners tend to stay rooted.
• Law firms maintain and slowly grow out their partner and senior associate base, while simultaneously calculating the hiring numbers for junior associates to reflect the degree of attrition they can expect based on historical statistics.

“Validators should simply recognize that CDM is a multi-billion dollar industry heavily focused on the skills and expertise their employees possess; and as such their personnel are highly valuable, and they should re-assess the financial packages presently being offered to mid-level and senior employees.” says Jon Queen, Esq.

Finally, lawyer Jon M Queen summarizes, “Validators must transition into a more commercially oriented employee compensation mindset, to set the CDM validation and registration process back on track. That is the best and most direct solution to the present bottleneck.“

So interestingly enough it seems as if a major success factor for major law firms is attributable to their compensation packages, structures, and scaling capabilities. Obviously HR practices play a significant role in any successful business, but I found it interesting to see other large industries that could potentially see such significant benefit from adopting a close model.

One indicator of such misleading marketing tactics is when the offered plan is just too good to be true. And because of the implementation of ‘lock-in’ rule, wherein beneficiaries are not allowed to switch plans; all the more that this misleading advertising poses a great threat to the public than ever before.

Here are some marketing tactics HMOs use to lure beneficiaries to sign up for coverage:

• Unlimited prescription drug coverage. Consumers must be warned about this unlimited generic and brand name prescription drug coverage offer by several HMOs. The ‘unlimited’ catch is misleading since most HMOs cover only medications listed on a formulary or preferred drug lists.
• Better than Original Medicare. Some medical plans are actually offering more benefits than Medicare but they are not really for free. They come at a cost.
• $0 Premium offer. Plans often boast of a $0 premium while in fact individuals are required to pay their Medicare Part B premiums, done monthly at $78.20.

There are I guess a lot more, but the point here is that beneficiaries should really be on-guard against these marketing tactics. A nationwide list of healthcare specialist attorneys is available for those who might need some assistance in this particular issue.

A kid steals a candy bar because he wants to enjoy the taste; a dope addict sticks up a grocery store, shooting the owner, in order to get the money he needs to get “high”; a bank executive embezzles a million dollars so he can run off with his girlfriend to enjoy life in the Bahamas. What is the common motive behind these crimes? According to Jagad Guru Chris Butler, the desire for sense gratification. Chris Butler is “Jagad Guru”, or teacher of Yoga’s ancient spiritual wisdom.

Criminologists and social scientists have almost completely overlooked the fact that materialism is the root cause of crime. False identification of the body as the self leads people to believe that sense enjoyment will satisfy them; and most crimes are directly or indirectly connected to the attempt to find satisfaction in sense enjoyment.

The media saturates us daily with the message that the goal of life is sensual pleasure, and that success in life depends on the acquisition of those objects that make such sensual pleasure possible. From a young age, we learn that we should strive to be the controllers and enjoyers of all we survey. We are promised that such “lordship” is the way to happiness.

The criminal is just responding to this message the best way he knows how. He’s just trying to get the things the TV says he needs to be happy. He’s just trying to be the central enjoying agent—the lord—that he’s been taught he needs to be. So he needs a flashy car, fine clothes, a big house, a color TV, a gold watch, a yacht, etc.

Since no amount of sense gratification is ever enough to satisfy us, we always feel we need “more.” From the poorest person to the richest person, from the homeless to the person who lives in a mansion, everyone wants more sense gratification and thus more material wealth. If you are poor, you feel you need a color TV to be happy; if you’re rich, you feel you need a new yacht. “No amount of material wealth is ever enough” says Jagad Guru Chris Butler.

So we have crooks from all income levels. The poor crooks commit crimes so that they can get what they think they need; the rich crooks commit crimes so that they can get what they think they need. The street crook robs people so he can buy some nice clothes or drugs; the corporate crook robs companies so that he can buy 50,000 acres of land or a new Lear jet.

The fact that there are at least as many “wealthy” criminals as there are “poor” criminals effectively destroys the materialists’ theory that the root cause of crime is poverty and that the solution to the crime problem is to make everybody rich. Obviously, if poverty were the cause of crime, then no wealthy people would commit crimes. Besides, the term “poverty” is relative. A poor American, for example, would be a wealthy Ethiopian. In fact, criminals, whether rich or poor, are criminals not because they are poor or rich, but because they are in the illusion that material things will satisfy them. And, of course, the reason they are in this illusion is because they erroneously identify their body as themselves.

Because our materialistic society teaches that the acquisition of wealth and power is the goal of life, the more wealth and power you possess, the more “successful” you are considered to be. If you are materially poor, you are considered a failure in life, whereas if you are wealthy and powerful (regardless of how you acquired such wealth and power), you are considered a great success. So obtaining material wealth is not only essential for your direct sense gratification, but also for your feelings of self-worth.

In other words, you feel only as valuable as the things that you possess and control. Lacking appreciation of your real value as an eternal, blissful spark of life—falsely identifying the temporary body as yourself—you try to achieve feelings of self-worth by the acquisition and control of material things. To achieve such economic development, you may end up engaging in illegal activity—in other words, you may become a crook.

If people understand this practical knowledge about the root cause of crime, then they can effectively deal with the criminal problems facing us today. Only by knowing this real root cause can an effective solution be found.

For more materials by Jagad Guru Chris Butler, visit the Jagad Guru Chris Butler Wisdom page.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx–jNQYNgA

The video looks as though it could have been shot at almost any sleepy corporate seminar in the country, with one camera panning between a man in a suit and tie standing at a podium and others seated nearby. But the dialogue is riveting: It’s a group of lawyers openly discussing strategies for helping their clients pretend that they’re trying to recruit American workers—as required by law—while they, in fact, hire cheaper foreign workers. 

“[O]ur goal is clearly not to find a qualified and interested U.S. worker,” says Lawrence Lebowitz, director of marketing for the Pittsburgh law firm Cohen & Grigsby, before an audience of employers at the firm’s conference. The seminar provides details on how employers can meet the government’s requirements for the Permanent Labor Certificate program (PERM), which lets employers sponsor foreign workers for permanent residency if they can demonstrate no U.S. worker can fill a job. The trick, according to Cohen & Grigsby attorneys, is to only go through the motions of hiring Americans without ever intending to.

The video, which has been posted on YouTube (GOOG), is now sparking a sharp backlash. On June 21, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Representative Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) fired off a letter to Cohen & Grigsby demanding an explanation for its advice, as well as going so far as to ask for the names of its clients. “Your firm’s video advises employers how to hire only foreign labor, while making it nearly impossible for a qualified American worker to get a job,” they wrote. “We look forward to hearing from you on how such advice is ethical and does not undermine the programs by enticing fraud and misuse.” (See the lawmakers’ letter here.) A public relations firm representing Cohen & Grigsby did not return phone calls seeking comment.

WASHINGTON, DC — (MARKET WIRE) — 04/04/07 — The American Bar Association’s Law Practice Management Section will commemorate the 30th anniversary of the seminal law firm marketing case, Bates v. Arizona, on November 8-9, 2007 in Washington, DC with its first-ever Law Firm Marketing Strategies Conference.

The event features a number of all-attorney panels that will provide practicing lawyers with the most comprehensive look at how law firm marketing has evolved and where the profession is heading, as well as programs aimed at assisting lawyers and firms with improving their business development strategies.

“Bates set in motion an entire industry that continues to define the legal profession,” said Micah Buchdahl, Conference Chair for the Law Firm Marketing Strategies Conference. “It’s time to take a step back and look at what is working for law firms and examine where we can make strides.”

The two-day event will feature some of the most relevant and integral law firm marketing experts in the country, including Van O’Steen from Bates v. Arizona to talk about legal ethics; strategic communications specialist Chris Lehane and Infinite Public Relations’ Jamie Diaferia to talk about crisis communications, as well as a program on the impact of diversity initiatives on law firm business.

“The concept of law firm marketing continues to be an enigma to many members of the bar,” Buchdahl said. “This conference will address concerns, but also teach ‘best practices’ for moving forward with smart initiatives.”

Other panels will address some of the most pressing marketing issues faced by law firms of all sizes, including business development spending and technology marketing. In addition, the Conference will include two Extreme Marketing programs featuring ten speakers talking about ten topics for ten minutes apiece. These programs will feature partners from 20 national law firms.

The event will be held at the Omni Shoreham Hotel from 9 a.m. on Thursday, November 8, 2007 through 2 p.m. on Friday, November 9. A room block has been secured at an ABA LPM rate of $239/night.

For more information about the event and how to register, please visit www.lawpractice.org/marketingconference.

ABOUT THE ABA LAW PRACTICE MANAGEMENT SECTION

The mission of the ABA Law Practice Management Section is to provide innovative and practical information on marketing, management, technology, and finance, enabling legal professionals to better serve clients, achieve career goals, and balance their lives. The American Bar Association is the largest voluntary professional membership association in the world, with more than 400,000 members.

CONTACT:
Micah Buchdahl, Esq.
Conference Chair
American Bar Association - Law Practice Management Section
(856) 234-4334

Carey stressed that this focused communication is important in order to help CEOs properly address their corporate obligations. He noticed that most CEOs arrive to take on a very challenging responsibility without enough preparation. And that even those who have been carefully groomed for succession suddenly realized that their experiences were not enough to fully be armed for the special job circumstances that face the new CEO.

Senior Managers may have been responsible for a small unit of the company, but they were members of the chain of command, not really the ones making those big decisions. Aside from that, most new CEOs have never tried presiding a board meeting. According to Dennis Carey, these, and other pressures confront CEOs and they can better serve their companies when they have been formally prepared for these issues and how they can properly cope with the pressure.

Carey understands the difficulties CEOs go through as they fulfill their responsibilities and the encourages CEOs to help each other by sharing their thoughts and experiences so that other CEOs, especially the new ones, can learn and deal with their concerns in a most efficient manner.

“That is why we have come to believe that CEOs need to learn what they can from others who have acquired, largely by trial-and-error, insights into how to run a company. We believe there is an immense and largely untapped body of knowledge on these subjects. It resides among the fraternity of experienced, seasoned, and retired CEOs who have been working in the trenches for many years. They may well be the best “executive education” resource for current and future CEOs.” – Dennis Carey

More about Dennis C. Carey - Books by Dennis Carey: Here, Here, and Here

A list of 15 rules for clients. This is brilliant.

The George Lindemann Jr pro blogger program just doesn’t seem to offer any substance. George, if I was going to do an all in one blogging program (and I’ve thought about it before), it would go something like this:

• Two Options: Hosted or Host yourself
• Hosted - Change templates to fit your ideal look and feel, preinstalled tools and plugins, monetization, etc.
• Host yourself - a plugin pack included in the plugin directory, optimization guide (simple, effective), monetization optimized templates, etc.

I would also talk about building real links. George Lindemann Jr’s program focuses on social media links which aren’t that effective (not from those sites anyways).

I’m strongly considering a full on legal blogging package.

Which brings me to the question: With blogs, should frequency of posting trump the quality of posts?

In some senses, I think so. First, frequency of blogging is often tied into attracting a following. I know that personally, as I tend to visit blogs that are updated daily (or at least a few times a week) over blogs that are infrequently updated yet have quality posts.

However, in the end, it is the quality of posts that make the blog. If the information I’m reading isn’t interesting and informative, it could be updated every hour- I’m not coming back.

So, I think there’s a balance. Keeping a blog that is updated regularly even when the author does not have a completely original, informative post. But at the same time, I truly believe bloggers should stay away from “forcing it.”

To me, “forcing it” happens when you do not have a topic to write about, yet you try to produce a post anyway. When that happens to me, I usually just link to something else I’ve found interesting. If I’m really uninspired, I’ll go into photoshop and make a picture of something ridiculous and post it without any explanation. Like this:

From it:

If one person can produce ineffective crappy marketing, imagine what a committee can do.